Search forums

 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

May 21, 2012, 03:18:27 PM
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: sneak peak  (Read 3033 times)
paul cannon
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 740



View Profile
« on: August 16, 2007, 08:22:58 AM »

before the gloss
there's masking tape hanging down off the rail to catch spray drip
if your wondering why the outline looks a bit wack at the tail
and a quick vid of the other weekend
sick as dudes
 3 surfs that day
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0qN6-xoo-M


* sneakpeak1.jpg (58.03 KB, 691x497 - viewed 114 times.)

* sneak2.jpg (52.47 KB, 662x418 - viewed 253 times.)

* sneak3.jpg (49.9 KB, 480x640 - viewed 101 times.)
Logged
ScottC
Jr. Member
**

Stoke: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 10


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2007, 09:37:18 AM »

I was wondering what prompted your move to the foam bottoms.  Ease of assembly, performance benefits, or just tougher against rocks?  Or maybe it allows one to shape the bottom side of the rail with less worries of exposing the eps?  Also curious how much effort is involved in obtaining the foam for the bottom skin.

btw.  board looks very nice!
Logged
mark venn
Compsand Member
****

Stoke: 9
Offline Offline

Posts: 88



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2007, 01:19:33 PM »

Looking very professional Pauly, like the new logos and the foam bottom.
Mark
Logged
paul cannon
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 740



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2007, 01:32:45 AM »

thanks guys

i think the question should be
why do you use wood on the deck?

scott, i use the foam on the bottom because it is waterproof and flexible
also just wanted to show that a firewire type board is a piece of wees to make in the backyard. lol

a lot of guys mistake the gold foam on the rail for balsa
i can only get foam in green,pink or brown

you can get various types of foams and epoxys from boatbuilding suplies at around 70 to 130 per sheet
Logged
jeff matsuno
Compsand Member
****

Stoke: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 83


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2007, 03:19:26 PM »

Looks nice.  Versatile too.  I like that it can be a thruster, quad or five fin.  How does that five fin set up compare to Griffin's?  The back fins look pretty far up.

I also like the contrasting "stringer" wood.   Different species?  Full length?

Anyways, looking very good.
Logged
jeff matsuno
Compsand Member
****

Stoke: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 83


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2007, 03:27:48 PM »

Right after I posted I found this-

A little different than yours.  It looks you your 5 fin version can line up or be offset.

Anxiously waiting for ride reports....
Logged
paul cannon
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 740



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2007, 01:23:33 AM »

my mate is haveing a good time on its brother in indo
the first one i built exactly same fin setup same plane shape
hes been riding with fcs pg5s as a quad i think
and that little yellow eps quad fish i made ages ago
im to surf this one on some quality rivermouth waves later in the week
east coast banks are world class at the mo
had 4 foot glassy reef 2 guys out yesterday
Logged
paul cannon
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 740



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 20, 2007, 09:12:28 PM »

finished


* tn_P8210232.JPG (58.25 KB, 533x400 - viewed 906 times.)

* tn_P8210237.JPG (52.85 KB, 533x400 - viewed 909 times.)

* tn_P8210226.JPG (35.29 KB, 300x400 - viewed 94 times.)

* tn_P8210223.JPG (37.54 KB, 300x400 - viewed 96 times.)
Logged
paul cannon
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 740



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2007, 09:15:35 PM »

more


* tn_P8210236.JPG (28.38 KB, 300x400 - viewed 95 times.)

* tn_P8210227.JPG (32.75 KB, 300x400 - viewed 101 times.)

* tn_P8210224.JPG (19.71 KB, 300x400 - viewed 883 times.)

* tn_P8210231.JPG (50.99 KB, 533x400 - viewed 103 times.)
Logged
Benny
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 97



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2007, 10:22:30 PM »

I'm really loving that logo, Paul. 

Its like waves, flight, and a little muscle.

And the board's sweet too  Grin
Logged

Don't taze me, bro.
surfer_dave
Sr. Member
****

Stoke: 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 72



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2007, 05:15:12 AM »

Looks good Paul,

Mucho respecto that you get so many fins to work well! I've seen some boards where it just doesn't come together in the end, anything more than three remains a mystery to me..

Are you preferring the foam/wood combo to all wood?

Logged
paul cannon
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 740



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 21, 2007, 06:03:02 AM »

cheers benny
somone wants a tee shirt already LOL

yeah dave
i am preferring foam bottom skins at the moment
the last couple have felt pretty good to ride
a bit more flex i think
it is basically a mckee quad setup with a centre option
just a pain doing it with fcs
honestly added and hour and half or more to the board


* tn_P8210228.JPG (30.54 KB, 300x400 - viewed 101 times.)
« Last Edit: August 21, 2007, 06:12:38 AM by paul cannon » Logged
hunty
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 4
Offline Offline

Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2007, 06:30:20 AM »



i think the question should be
why do you use wood on the deck?



Yeah i was wondering about that, I thought maybe it is some how flex related although can't for the life of me think how.Also i was wondering if (since you only have one layer of wood) you use 5(for example) instead of 3 mm.
Logged

"I had no shoes and complained............until i met a man with no feet."
paul cannon
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 740



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2007, 10:42:38 PM »

berts doing wood bottoms and foam decks
the domed deck skin is the main stiffener of a compsand board imo
make it wood and its even stiffer
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!