Search forums

 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

May 21, 2012, 04:00:51 PM
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Last-A-Foam  (Read 1782 times)
Bernhardt
Feature Member
****

Stoke: 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 188


View Profile
« on: October 12, 2008, 01:00:54 PM »

picked up a sheet Friday from Fiberglass Hawaii
Alittle expensive at $40 for a 1"x2'x8' panel compared to $17 for a 1"x2'x8' panel of blue dow
But it's 6lb density and has the same texture and flex as expensive corecel.
gonna give it a try as rail material.
it might be a good compromise

I'm also working with Ken at Segway to get some 2lb blanks with no stringers and some of the Warvel PU foam which runs about the same price as the last-a-foam stuff not including the expensive shipping costs to hawaii.

Been think of doing a video of our "cook your hootch in a home made still" approach to building boards for those adventure some spirits who want to make boards with off the shelf retail supplies throwing in the new rail and skin technique now trademarked "timberflex" and "compsand". I understand the need for them but it feels funny that I have to worry about something like that.

Anyway
anyone know anything about this last-a-foam stuff?
Its alot more flexible that I would've thought

Oh yea
I'm going to cut rail band strips of the woven or flat bamboo veneer and use that as the perimeter stringer versus 1/8" inch balsa or cedar. Bottom will be woven bamboo mat top with be flat cut bamboo veneer over Lowes 0.75lb EPS or blue dow
Logged
goomba271
Full Member
***

Stoke: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2008, 05:28:31 AM »

Hi Bernie -

I've used it for fin cores.  Rumor has it that it is subject to breakdown...  I.E. a sheet of it used as a skin core might result in some sort of internal rupture/separation in the core itself - not a direct delamination of the outer skin. 

It was discussed on a homebuilt airplane site... 

http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/forums/composites/2898-last-foam-ok-maybe-new-parts-pvc-vacuum-infusion.html

"One of the first tasks I did for Glasair was an engineering review of selected materials and specifically, foams. This was about a year (give or take a bit) after the company transitioned from Klegecell to the Last-A-Foam material. After about three months of research, my conclusion in the report was that the Polyurethane foam as manufactured by General Plastics is unsuitable for primary structure in any aircraft application. The reason was primarily due to the material's highly friable surface, which was susceptible to damage through impact or vibration, or simply though inadequate preparation prior to lamination. I also saw evidence that the cell and/or chemical structure of the foam at times interfered with the proper curing of the resin, often resulting in inadequate properties in service.

The result of the report was twofold - first, the company modified my text to suit their own needs, then buried it. However they did institute an improved handling and cleaning process (dedicated cutting room and a separate vacuum/clean room) that resulted in a much cleaner surface on the foam prior to it being placed in the mold. Now, it must be pointed out that outside of the damaged firewalls I have not seen nor am aware of any other failures of the sandwich as a result of normal service. But I still hold the potential is there."

 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!